![]() Principal Advisors are approved UQ staff members that take primary academic responsibility for the candidate during their candidature. The Director of HDR is appointed by the Head of the Academic Organisational Unit and the Dean of the Graduate School to provide academic oversight of HDR candidates within the Unit. ![]() The Dean of the UQ Graduate School (or their delegate) approves specifications for the Progress Review requirements at each AOU and ensures this information is visible to all HDR candidates. Roles, Responsibilities and Accountabilities Resources allocation (including advisory commitments) for the AOU andįurther details describing the timing and expectations for successfully completing each Progress Review can be found in the accompanying document Higher Degree by Research Candidature Progression– Procedures.ģ. The academic development and progress of the candidate Consequently, UQ will work collaboratively with those sponsorship bodies to achieve an outcome acceptable to both parties.Ĭompleting each Progress Review plays an important role in: UQ is mindful of the nature and importance of its research training partnerships. ![]() In some instances, external funding bodies may have additional expectations for reporting progress as a condition of funding or sponsorship. Progress Reviews are important elements of the research training provided to and undertaken by HDR candidates and are mandatory for all HDR candidates. This policy applies to all HDR candidates enrolled at The University of Queensland.Ĭandidature progression is monitored through Progress Reviews. This policy describes the UQ-wide system of progression for HDR candidates and should be read in conjunction with Higher Degree by Research Candidature Progression Procedures.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |